Assignment 7: Previous Feedback
Here are some examples of feedback that students have previously received on assignment 7, along
with the number of times each feedback comment was given.
If you find a comment helpful, click the star next to it to mark it as helpful.
Assignment requirements have changed slightly, so these may not directly match the feedback you will
get this time, but they are provided here as helpful guidance.
Rubric Item
Helpful?
Comment
# Times given
User Testing Plan
The steps are too directive and detailed, biasing users to specific directions at each point of interaction.
2
Detailed protocol but there isn't any "script"
2
It's good to be comprehensive, but I barely see what you might want to specifically test out.
1
task is not really completed per se in terms of functionality
1
The instructions don't give the user a specific task to complete. It should test out the core functionality in a real scenario.
1
Please select all relevant pages in the PDF.
1
Avoid using quantitative scales for your interview questions because these will not garner you good insights.
1
very sparse and too directly guiding the user. plan to ask more questions and gather more input.
1
Missing consent form.
1
Try reducing the focus on interface elements/details, phrasing it more naturally instead.
1
Well detailed
1
It seems a bit artificial to ask a user to assume a persona.
1
Complete functionality
the user needs more orientation, it's still a little confusing, but it looks good
4
major bug = broken navigation
3
Good work :)
2
i need your github repo link
2
Please check that the links are clickable!
2
I noticed you have a lot of html pages. I wonder if rendering your JSON through handlebars might be easier?
1
Not bad, but could use a little more visual design
1
Main issue is the sizing issue.
1
Visual elements such as headers look inconsistent.
1
Cool functionality when it works!
1
no Json being loaded
1
Not seeing a require or template render anywhere
1
Interface elements are cut off in responsive mode. Please let me know if it works better in some other config.
1
App works really well as far as the testing went.
1
You aren't writing to a db :(
1
Symbols and navigation are might be a bit confusing for a new user
1
while it looks nice, needs more in terms of implementation
1
close enough. needs a little more polish, but no major issues.
1
This is minor, but Users are able to submit empty information. Not sure if that's intended
1
Awesome!
1
There's at least one glaring typo.
1
more visualizations and interaction with them, basically there
1
Add some questions asked by users
1
Unlabeled icons in the hamburger menu is an odd choice.
1
Clean visual design
1
just needs minor tweaking in terms of design such as being mobile responsive
1
can be polished in terms of navigation layout and making it smoother with some of the placement of buttons
1
Development Plan
need to see more progress on your app, not putting in much work for 3 people
1
Please provide it in the correct orientation as far as possible!
1
Unclear whether these tasks were completed as there isn't anything input with regards to whether the task is in progress or complete.
1
good use of your plan so far
1
Tasks should be a bit more specific. Also, breakdown of tasks among the team seems a bit uneven.
1
provide more details on your development plan
1
You need to show a comparison of your updated development plan with your earlier one.
1
next time make your dev plan bigger, can barely tell its been updated
1
The protocol is well designed and puts a good focus on the interactions.
1
The core functionality of the application still appears to be missing. I would encourage your team to focus on that aspect.
1